Load characteristics of steel and concrete tubular members under jet fire: An experimental and numerical study
Introduction
The Piper Alpha accident of 1988 was the world’s worst offshore oil disaster in terms of both lives lost and impact on the industry (Cullen, 1990). The total insured loss was about £1.7 billion (US$ 3.4 billion), and 167 people were killed. Other major fire accidents caused by gas leaks include the two incidents that occurred on the Enchova Central offshore oil platform in Brazil in 1984 and 1988, the first of which killed 42 people (Alvaro et al., 2001).
The possibility of fire hazard has grown as the number of offshore structures has increased. Accurate safety design values are thus required for guidelines on the design of passive fire protection (PFP) and firewalls. Fire action cannot be represented by an analytical expression that can be handled easily. To overcome this problem, an approach based on the numerical calculation for fire loads is needed along with the development of a suitable computing system.
Further, there is a lack of standardized methods and coordination for the calculation of fire loads acting on structures and equipment and their corresponding consequences. To provide robust guidance on the design of steel structures to resist jet fires, the characteristics of both fire action and its effects must be identified (Czujko, 2001, Czujko, 2005, Czujko, 2007, Paik and Thayamballi, 2003, Paik and Thayamballi, 2007, Paik, 2010).
This paper focuses on the load characteristics of steel and concrete tubular members under jet fire. Generally, fire involves the combination of a combustible vapor or gas with an oxidizer in a combustion process that is manifested by the evolution of light, heat, and flame (Nolan, 1996). Fig. 1 shows the shape of a jet fire with a specific leak direction.
Jet fires can arise following the pressurized release of various fuel types (FABIG 2009). The simplest case is a pressurized gas giving rise to a gas jet fire. A pressurized liquid/gas mixture (such as “live crude” or gas dissolved in a liquid) gives rise to a two-phase jet fire. The gas content and mechanical energy in the stream atomize the liquid into droplets, which are then evaporated by radiation from the flame. However, the pressurized release of a liquid causes rapid vaporization. This is most likely to occur when a liquid undergoes some degree of superheating, i.e., when it is released from containment at a temperature above its boiling point in ambient conditions, whereupon flash evaporation occurs and a flashing liquid jet fire results. This event may arise from the release of propane or butane. Non-volatile liquids (for example, kerosene, diesel, or stabilized crude) are unlikely to be able to sustain a two-phase jet fire, unless permanently piloted by an adjacent fire, but even so some liquid drop-out is likely, leading to the formation of a pool.
In the present study, steel tubular members are used in place of real tubular members of offshore installations to evaluate the jet fire load, including the effects of conduction, convection, and radiation. However, it is assumed that there is no conduction effect on concrete tubular members, as computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes set up an adiabatic wall boundary condition.
The main objectives of the study were as follows:
- •
To obtain the ideal jet fire load through numerical and experimental methods, taking into consideration heat transfer such as conduction, convection, and radiation on steel and concrete tubular members.
- •
To study a CFD technique with ANSYS CFX, (2008) and KFX, 2007 for modeling FPSO and offshore structures under jet fire action.
Section snippets
Experimental study
An analysis of heat load under jet fire is needed to take into account the complicated issues of heat transfer conduction, convection, and radiation. The original objective of this research was to conduct jet fire tests with steel tubular members to which passive fire protection (PFP) had been applied on an offshore plant. However, concrete tubular members were chosen as the PFP material due to the process required to apply PFP, such as cleaning, blasting, priming, and the addition of mesh work
Computational fluid dynamics analysis
A wide range of models are available for calculating fire dimensions and loads. There are several simple hand calculation models that are based on empirical data. At the other extreme, there are several computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software packages that allow very sophisticated calculations to be performed.
To validate and verify the jet fire test results, the CFD codes Kameleon FireEx (KFX, 2007) and ANSYS CFX were used to conduct a numerical study with homogenous conditions. ANSYS CFX,
Concluding remarks
In this study, the load characteristics of steel and concrete tubular members under jet fire were determined. The results can be used in the design of passive fire protection (PFP) for application in offshore plant and floating production storage and offloading system (FPSO). Different load characteristics were identified and predicted for different materials, pipe diameters, and an equipment under jet fire.
Although there was differential pressure in the mass flow controller, it was confirmed
Acknowledgments
This study was undertaken at the Lloyd’s Register Educational Trust (LRET) Research Centre of Excellence at Pusan National University, Korea. The results are part of Phase II of the Joint Industry Project on Explosion and Fire Engineering of FPSOs (EFEF JIP). The authors are pleased to acknowledge the support of the partners involved in the EFEF JIP, including Pusan National University (Korea), Hyundai Heavy Industries (Korea), Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering (Korea), American Bureau
References (16)
- et al.
Contingency Planning for Oil Spill Accidents in Brazil
(2001) - ANSYS CFX, 2008. release 11.0, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA,...
The Public Inquiry into the Piper Alpha Disaster
(1990)Design of Offshore Facilities to Resist Gas Explosion Hazard: Engineering Handbook
(2001)- Czujko, J., 2005. Computational methods in the analysis of explosion resistant barriers. In: Proceedings of...
- Czujko, J., 2007. Consequences of explosions in various industries. Safety and reliability of industrial products,...
- FABIG, 2009. Technical Note II: Fire Loading and Structural Response. Berkshire,...
- HSE, 1999. Review of Analysis of Explosion Response, Health and Safety Executive report—OTO 98174, London,...